Welcome to JPiC Forum For Writers! Please log in or sign up to interact with our Community.
  1. Welcome!

    Hello Guest | Welcome To Jacquii's Poetry in Color Forum


    JPiC Forum for Writers is an online community exclusively dedicated to the share of poetry and writing. As a continuing work-in-progress, our poetry forums host a melange of writing with new additions being posted daily. We encourage you to right now and come join us in our celebration of diversity with the typed word!

Discussion in 'Essays' started by jakeminick, May 3, 2011.



    jakeminick McGonagall's Ghost

    Member Since:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Message Count:
    172
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Books:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +14 / 0 / -0

    Supposing there was a man who did not believe in intuition, but only logic.
    This man met another man who was able to predict events, or find the inner truth of things based merely on intuition. The logical man observed that the intuitive man was correct about such things, say, 90 percent of the time, while pure logical hypothesis was right, let’s say, 88 percent of the time.
    Now logic would tell one that in sources of information one should choose the higher percentage to find the answers. Yet, this goes against the logical man’s belief in logic, in that, since the intuitive man’s predictions are not made using logic, they are by that fact not a useful source of information. However, the logical man’s firm belief in logic actually goes against the logical principle, to go with the higher percentage.


    Posted By jakeminick | May 3, 2011
    #1

We hope you're enjoying our forum!

Only registered Members have access to posting priviledges. Registration here is 100% FREE. Use the button below to begin registration or the form on the right to login to your account.

Forgot your password?

Share This Page