Welcome to JPiC Forum For Writers! Please log in or sign up to interact with our Community.
  1. Welcome!

    Hello Guest | Welcome To Jacquii's Poetry in Color Forum


    JPiC Forum for Writers is an online community exclusively dedicated to the share of poetry and writing. As a continuing work-in-progress, our poetry forums host a melange of writing with new additions being posted daily. We encourage you to right now and come join us in our celebration of diversity with the typed word!


  1. Lurking

    MsJacquiiC Poetica Magnifique

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Message Count:
    5,998
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    In a cloud of smoke...
    Home page:
    Books:
    2
    Ratings Received:
    +133 / 1 / -0


    Here, the feature-writing guru offers the inside story on how he crafts his Pulitzer-grade prose.
    Gene Weingarten suggests that winning a Pulitzer Prize is “pure luck.”

    “The Pulitzer is a crapshoot,” The Washington Post feature writer/humor columnist says. “Your piece has to hit a few people the right way at the right moment.”

    Easy for Weingarten to be modest: He’s the only two-time winner of the Pulitzer for feature article writing. In the first, 2008’s “The Fiddler in the Subway” (“Pearls Before Breakfast” when it first appeared in The Washington Post), Weingarten arranged for violin virtuoso Joshua Bell to play outside a D.C. Metro station during morning rush hour to see if anyone would notice. His 2010 winner, “Fatal Distraction,” recounts stories of parents who accidentally killed their children by forgetting them in cars.

    Those stories and 18 others are collected in The Fiddler in the Subway, which includes an introduction that doubles as a superbly instructive primer on writing.

    Here, the feature-writing guru offers the inside story on how he crafts his Pulitzer-grade prose.

    What’s the one thing an aspiring writer must understand about writing?
    I can tell you what it’s definitely not. It’s definitely not “I before e except after c,” because what about ‘either’”?

    But seriously … is there one thing an aspiring writer must understand?
    That it’s hard. If you think it’s not hard, you’re not doing it right.

    One of the things I admire about your work is that you consistently prove that great writing begins with great reporting. Talk about the importance of reporting.
    Well, let’s start with the maxim that the best writing is understated, meaning it’s not full of flourishes and semaphores and tap dancing and vocabulary dumps that get in the way of the story you are telling. Once you accept that, what are you left with? You are left with the story you are telling.

    The story you are telling is only as good as the information in it: things you elicit, or things you observe, that make a narrative come alive; things that support your point not just through assertion, but through example; quotes that don’t just convey information, but also personality. That’s all reporting.

    What distinguishes a well-told story from a poorly told one?
    All of the above. Good reporting, though, requires a lot of thinking; I always counsel writers working on features to keep in mind that they are going to have to deliver a cinematic feel to their anecdotes. When you are interviewing someone, don’t just write down what he says. Ask yourself: Does this guy remind you of someone? What does the room feel like? Notice smells, voice inflection, neighborhoods you pass through. Be a cinematographer.

    Do you have any particular writing rituals or techniques that would help other writers?
    Until I got to the end of your sentence, I had an answer. Alas, I don’t think this would be helpful to many writers: After I report a story, I look at my notes carefully, then lock them away and don’t look at them again until I have a first draft. I find it liberating to write without being chained to your notes; it helps you craft an ideal story. Then I go back to the notes and realize what I wrote that I can’t really support, what quotes aren’t quite as good as I thought, etc. It can be hugely frustrating, but it also sometimes leads me to go back and improve reporting, to make the story as good as I thought it could be. Not sure this will be helpful to most people. It’s kind of insane.

    You say all stories are ultimately about the meaning of life. How do you find that heart of the story?
    By persuading yourself, going in to a story, that it must be about something larger than itself—some universal truth—and always searching for whatever that is. Sometimes, midway through, you realize it’s not what you thought, it’s something else. But, to quote Roseanne Rosannadanna, “ … It’s always something.”

    Let’s say you only get 20 minutes with your subject. How do you find the meaning of life in 20 minutes?
    Nasty question. But you gotta be fair here: I never said all stories have to explain the meaning of life. All stories have to at least try to explain some small portion of the meaning of life. You can do that in 20 minutes, and 15 inches. I still remember a piece that the great Barry Bearak did in The Miami Herald some 30 years ago. It was a nothing story, really: Some high school kid was leading a campaign to ban books he found offensive from the school library. Bearak didn’t even have an interview with the kid, who was ducking him. The story was short, mostly about the issue.

    But Bearak had a fact that he withheld until the kicker. The fact put the whole story, subtly, in complete perspective. The kicker noted the true, wonderful fact that the kid was not in school that day because “his ulcer was acting up.” Meaning of life, 15 inches.


    [ Source: Writers Digest ]

    Attached Files:



    Posted By MsJacquiiC | Dec 8, 2012
    #1

  2. Depressed

    butchiesmom JPiC Premium VIP Member

    Member Since:
    Oct 20, 2006
    Message Count:
    679
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Location:
    In a trailer, on a hill.
    Home page:
    Books:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +37 / 0 / -0
    Interesting. I wonder how this would apply to those writing fiction. The 'facts' they're noting would only be relevent for the characters and for the plot of the story which could be changed as needed to forward the plot.
    I did assume that a reporter would write with notes handy by the computer ready to be referenced as needed. His method does make sense. I've often been told some writers do put away what they've written for a bit then come back to it. That helps them see where they strayed from the direction the original plot was supposed to be heading. I, totally, should do that myself since I've gone back to some of what I've written and regretted ever exposing my friends to that kind of toture, lol.
    Thanks, Sis, for taking the time to find this informative article.
    Gail

We hope you're enjoying our forum!

Only registered Members have access to posting priviledges. Registration here is 100% FREE. Use the button below to begin registration or the form on the right to login to your account.

Forgot your password?

Share This Page

GreetingsGalleryOnline.com