Welcome to JPiC Forum For Writers! Please log in or sign up to interact with our Community.
  1. Welcome!

    Hello Guest | Welcome To Jacquii's Poetry in Color Forum

    JPiC Forum for Writers is an online community exclusively dedicated to the share of poetry and writing. As a continuing work-in-progress, our poetry forums host a melange of writing with new additions being posted daily. We encourage you to right now and come join us in our celebration of diversity with the typed word!

  1. Lurking

    MsJacquiiC Poetica Magnifique

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Message Count:
    Trophy Points:
    In a cloud of smoke...
    Home page:
    Ratings Received:
    +134 / 1 / -0

    We’ve been told not to split infinitives (or to not split them!) ever since grade school, and the reason goes way back. In Latin the infinitive form of a verb is one word, and as 19th-century grammarians were big Latin fans, they decided that the rules of English should conform to those of Latin.

    Most writers strive to keep their infinitives cozily joined together out of fear of looking ignorant of basic grammar....
    Hence, splitting an infinitive would be akin to splitting a word in half. But in modern times, when we are not translating Latin, splitting an infinitive is not necessarily bad grammar.

    For example:

    Before it careened out of sight, the car managed to just make the corner.

    In this sentence the infinitive is "to make," and inserting "just" between the infinitive puts the emphasis on the fact that it was a near thing.

    Another example:

    Our goal is to further cement relations between the two countries.

    Here the infinitive is split to emphasize "further." The more "correct" form changes the meaning of the sentence: Our goal is to cement further relations between the two countries.

    Or: Our goal is further to cement relations between the two countries. In this case, not splitting the infinitive leads to awkward phrasing and a clumsier sentence.

    Another example

    The famous Star Trek title sequence: To boldly go where no man has gone before!

    Again, this phrase loses strength when the infinitive is not split. To go boldly where no man has gone before just doesn’t pack the same punch.

    Most writers strive to keep their infinitives cozily joined together out of fear of looking ignorant of basic grammar. And it’s true that, most of the time, the infinitive functions best as a whole unit. However, the writer should always err on the side of comprehension and flow rather than the conventions of 19th-century Latin afficionados. George Bernard Shaw said it best when he wrote to The London Times:

    "There is a busybody on your staff who devotes a lot of time to chasing split infinitives: I call for the immediate dismissal of this pedant. It is of no consequence whether he decides to go quickly or to quickly go or quickly to go. The important thing is that he should go at once."

    [ Source: WritersRelief.com ]

    Attached Files:

    Posted By MsJacquiiC | Dec 13, 2007

We hope you're enjoying our forum!

Only registered Members have access to posting priviledges. Registration here is 100% FREE. Use the button below to begin registration or the form on the right to login to your account.

Forgot your password?

Share This Page